Advertisement

You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

Former CO to Navy: Fix leadership failures

Sep. 17, 2012 - 07:51AM   |   Last Updated: Sep. 17, 2012 - 07:51AM  |  
  • Filed Under
Capt. Mark Light reviewed 11 years of CO firing data for his master's thesis and determined these failures need to be addressed by the Navy (Navy)

As headlines show, commanding officer firings are becoming more and more frequent. Roughly half stem from personal misbehavior. Navy leaders have provided information on these firings to the public unlike other services but have stopped short of labeling the increase as troubling.

  • Please enable JavaScript for your browser in order to use navytimes.com.com.
Want to read more?
Current Subscribers
Access to Navy Times Prime is free for current Navy Times subscribers.
Log in
Haven't registered online?
Activate Account
New Subscribers
Start your subscription to Navy Times Prime for as little as 59¢ a week!
Subscribe

As headlines show, commanding officer firings are becoming more and more frequent. Roughly half stem from personal misbehavior. Navy leaders have provided information on these firings to the public unlike other services but have stopped short of labeling the increase as troubling.

Now, a former Navy CO has come forward with an approach to stem the tide of reliefs: It begins with acknowledging there's a problem.

Capt. Mark Light, a naval aviator, reviewed 11 years of CO detachments for cause for his master's thesis. His conclusion: These failures are a systemic problem the Navy needs to urgently address.

"The U.S. Navy has an integrity problem in the ranks of its commanding officers," Light wrote in a bombshell report published this summer in the Naval War College Review. "The number of COs fired for personal misconduct is too high, and we can and must do better but doing so will require that Navy leadership makes it a priority."

Light, now a professor at the U.S. Army War College, said in a Sept. 13 interview that he wrote the article to spark a discussion and prompt the Navy to re-examine the cultural forces underlying the reliefs.

"I don't think the sense of urgency has been elevated enough," Light said of the Navy's response. "[Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Jon Greenert] mentioned it. He addressed it with standards of command. But it still seems to be a minor nuisance sort of problem."

Navy spokesman Rear Adm. John Kirby dismissed Light's conclusion that these reliefs were a product of Navy culture, saying: "The whole culture of the Navy is designed to produce good leaders because we know that's how you have a good Navy."

In the article, Light calls the "Charge of Command" memo issued last year to reiterate the conduct demanded of COs "merely Scotch tape on the problem" and noted that publicizing CO firings hasn't resulted in fewer reliefs.

Light, who commanded Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 40 from 2006 to 2008, wrote that COs must concern themselves with their subordinates' character. When an officer exhibits a character flaw, it should be addressed. If they take responsibility and change, then they're better for it. But if they lie or deflect blame, then they may have "an intrinsic ethical void that must be documented," Light wrote.

"COs must explicitly demand integrity from them and mentor or document shortcomings appropriately," Light wrote. "Otherwise they encourage the behavior we want to eliminate in those chosen for command, which ensures the cycle will continue."

Here are three steps Light argues the Navy needs to take:

Track it. Create "a central database of every CO relieved of command owing to personal and professional failures (recording the specific cause for the dismissal, as well as demographic data) to facilitate future tracking and analysis."

Character campaign. The Navy should set explicit standards of integrity and character, and implement them as policy. Light suggests the Navy's core values honor, courage, commitment be expanded to include character. And he argues everyone needs more "regular, lively and meaningful emphasis on ethical behavior."

Change the fitrep. One of the seven performance categories on fitness reports is "military bearing/character." Light argues that character should become its own category and compares it with the Army's equivalent, in which an officer is rated on all seven of the Army's core values. "Such specific evaluation of character is required to emphasize the priorities we desire in commanding officers," Light wrote.

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan
Rates

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.


This Week's Navy Times

This Week's Navy Times

Best federal contractors
The companies hiring the most veterans now

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

Classifieds
MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.
Woman who cried rape
(3 replies)
   Last Post: TJMAC77SP
        May 3, 2014 1:32 PM
   Last Post: garhkal
        May 1, 2014 5:03 PM
Cliven Bundy
(45 replies)
   Last Post: Chief_KO
        Apr 26, 2014 9:49 AM
Handbooks

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook