You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

Pentagon takes 'second look' at embattled MIA unit

Jul. 9, 2013 - 06:00AM   |  
Members of the JPAC, Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command and South Korean Army soldiers search for remains of U.S. soldiers killed during the 1950-53 Korean War in Hwacheon, South Korea, in 2009.
Members of the JPAC, Joint POW/MIA Accounting Command and South Korean Army soldiers search for remains of U.S. soldiers killed during the 1950-53 Korean War in Hwacheon, South Korea, in 2009. (Ahn Young-joon/AP)
  • Filed Under

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon said Tuesday it will take a “second look” at how it goes about accounting for missing Americans on foreign battlefields, following the disclosure of an internal assessment that the work is “acutely dysfunctional” and at risk of failure.

“We have a sacred obligation to perform this mission well,” Pentagon press secretary George Little told reporters, referring to the Joint POW-MIA Accounting Command, or JPAC, which is based in Hawaii and run by a two-star general.

The U.S. estimates there are more than 83,000 Americans missing from World War II, Korea and Vietnam.

Over the past three years, JPAC has reported an average of 69 identifications of recovered remains per year, down from 85 per year over the previous three years. Congress is demanding that it make at least 200 identifications per year starting in 2015, a target it is widely expected to miss.

The Associated Press reported on Sunday that a 2012 internal assessment of JPAC’s field operations -- including the search for and recovery and identification of remains -- found it suffers from ineptitude, waste and mismanagement. JPAC leaders suppressed the study but the AP obtained a copy after it had been denied to others who requested it under the Freedom of Information Act.

“We’re going to review the concerns raised in the report to see how JPAC is or isn’t functioning well,” Little said. “And if steps need to be taken to remedy what’s happening inside JPAC, then we’ll take action. This is an important mission.”

The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, also has examined JPAC. A Pentagon spokesman, Lt. Col. Jim Gregory, said the Pentagon has responded to the GAO’s findings and recommendations and expects the results to be made public shortly.

Separately, members of Congress pressed the Pentagon and JPAC for answers. Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., wrote to JPAC’s commander, Maj. Gen. Kelly K. McKeague, to request a copy of the internal report and other documentation.

“We’ve got a responsibility to make sure this program is being run in a responsible manner, and I will not rest until we have answers,” McCaskill said. She is chairman of a subcommittee that focuses on government waste and fraud.

Little said the Pentagon’s review would be undertaken by the office of James Miller, the undersecretary of defense for policy, who oversees JPAC and other aspects of the Pentagon’s efforts to resolve the cases of missing service members. He said he could not yet spell out the exact parameters of the review.

Asked why Miller acted now, Little said not all of the problems cited in the internal JPAC report had been brought to the attention of senior Pentagon officials until after the AP wrote about them.

“Some of these concerns, quite frankly, didn’t bubble up,” Little said. “And it’s important when these concerns are raised to take a look, so I think it’s the prudent thing to do.”

The issues were not fully aired because the report, which was written by Paul M. Cole, a JPAC employee who studied the organization’s inner workings for more than a year, was essentially buried by JPAC commanders.

In an internal memo to his staff, the JPAC commander at the time, Maj. Gen. Stephen D. Tom, wrote on Feb. 3, 2012, that his organization would “not consider any allegations, findings or recommendations from the report,” which he said would “not be considered in future planning efforts” aimed at improving operations. He “disavowed” the study and said it was “rejected in its entirety.”

Tom said some parts of the study were “poorly written, reflect a bias and contain findings and recommendations that go beyond the intended scope of the report.” He demanded that it not be further shared or even copied.

Little was asked whether JPAC’s handling of the contentious report will be part of Miller’s review.

“This review hasn’t even been initiated, but it will be started shortly. And I would imagine that those and other questions will be asked as part of it,” he said.

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.

This Week's Navy Times

This Week's Navy Times

Go mustang
LDO and warrant careers offer more authority, a pay hike and big retirement payout

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook