You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

McHugh: Budget woes keep military 'dysfunctioning'

Oct. 28, 2013 - 03:03PM   |  
2013 AUSA MWM 20131021
'We have robbed Peter to pay Paul, then Paul got furloughed,' Army Secretary John McHugh said at the annual meeting of the Association of the U.S. Army. (Mike Morones/Staff)
  • Filed Under

Army Secretary John McHugh took direct shots at the lack of approved budgets in recent years.

Army Secretary John McHugh took direct shots at the lack of approved budgets in recent years.

  • Please enable JavaScript for your browser in order to use
Want to read more?
Current Subscribers
Access to Navy Times Prime is free for current Navy Times subscribers.
Log in
Haven't registered online?
Activate Account
New Subscribers
Start your subscription to Navy Times Prime for as little as 59¢ a week!

Army Secretary John McHugh took direct shots at the lack of approved budgets in recent years.

The last approved budget was signed three years before the iPad was released, he said. The military has since been funded by stopgap measures such as continuing resolutions designed to keep government functioning, “or dysfunctioning, as it were,” he said.

Continuing resolutions force the military to operate on the previous year’s budgets, which are billions less than the president’s current proposals.

“Last year, we didn’t get our budget until March, halfway through the year,” said Lt. Gen. William Ingram, director of the Army National Guard, “and the next week was midyear review. Give me a break. How do you do midyear review when you’re on the CR for six months?”

The solution was not optimal.

“We have robbed Peter to pay Paul, then Paul got furloughed,” McHugh said, adding this is no way to manage the greatest military in world, and “sure as hell” is no way to run a country.

McHugh said defense leaders knew cuts were coming but thought they would have the chance to do it right.

“We were wrong,” he said.

Sequestration caused a $5.5 billion shortfall in fiscal 2013.

“Sequestration was a tool that was supposed to force compromise in Congress. It was not a tool developed to properly manage the downsizing of the Department of Defense or the Army. And that is the problem,” said Army Chief of Staff Gen. Ray Odierno. “The tool was not right.”

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.

This Week's Navy Times

This Week's Navy Times

Go mustang
LDO and warrant careers offer more authority, a pay hike and big retirement payout

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook